Head to the Cayuse Risk and Compliance landing page for more details on our protocol management solutions, or submit a request for information below to connect with a Cayuse representative.
Blog
Protocol Management in Research: A Practical Guide
- Healthcare
- Higher Education
- International
- Life Sciences
- Nonprofit
Key Takeaways
- Protocol management involves developing, refining, finalizing, and adhering to a research protocol.
- Protocol management is complicated by the information-dense nature of protocols, numerous handoffs required before finalization, and difficulties maintaining version control.
- The Cayuse Risk and Compliance Suite simplifies protocol management by streamlining and automating protocol development, submissions, reviews, and amendments.
No matter their topic, size, and scope, all research projects begin with developing a research protocol. The protocol serves as a document outlining why and how a project will be conducted, including the objectives, design, methodology, and considerations for subject treatment, safety, and ethics.
Protocols must undergo reviews and revisions to ensure the research has clear objectives, sound methods, and can be conducted safely according to all relevant guidelines and regulations. Compliance teams and research administrators, therefore, have an important duty not only to enforce standards, but also to ensure protocols are effectively managed to navigate reviews and revisions for a successful project kickoff.
What is protocol management in research?
Protocol management often refers to the work involved in developing, submitting, reviewing, refining, finalizing, and adhering to a research protocol. Over its lifetime, a protocol will pass through several teams and undergo changes before reaching its final state. For this reason, the submitting PIs, administrators, and reviewers must carefully manage all handoffs, revision requests, and protocol versions to ensure important steps aren’t neglected.
Why protocol management becomes complicated
During the planning stage, PIs need to follow their institution’s guidelines for protocol development and ensure their protocol includes all necessary information and formatting. Failure to do so not only means a protocol will undoubtedly require additional time-consuming revisions, but also that the review process will be more difficult and take longer than necessary.
Once drafted, research protocols require review and approval from multiple regulatory bodies, including an Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) for projects involving recombinant DNA, synthetic nucleic acid molecules, infectious agents, biological toxins, federally-regulated select agents, and other biological hazards, an Institutional Review Board (IBC) to ensure ethical treatment and safety for research involving human subjects, and an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) to check that proper care, facilities, and precautions are established for research involving animal subjects.
PIs, administrators, and reviewers must work together to make sure protocols reach the right stakeholders in a timely manner and are appropriately reviewed, revised, and amended as needed. However, tracking multiple overlapping submissions and revisions can become confusing, leading to missed requests or a failure to address issues, setting a proposal back by days, weeks, or even months.
Poor version control also leads to confusion when PIs, administrators, and reviewers aren’t confident whether they are working from the most recent iteration of a proposal, especially in the aforementioned scenario when review periods overlap. Some organizations try to prevent this issue by requiring a set order for reviews. However, this can unnecessarily delay protocols and often involves duplicated effort for multiple submissions.
Fortunately, these challenges can all be preempted and mitigated with the right protocol management practices and software in place.
Simplify protocol planning with standardized templates
Easing protocol development starts with implementing standardized templates. Instead of starting from scratch with every protocol, templates help guide PIs through all the required sections of a protocol, ensuring that they don’t leave out crucial information. A standardized protocol framework can also prevent duplicate information entry for a cleaner, easier to review protocol.
Standardized protocol templates also help PIs break a draft into more manageable steps, allowing them to focus on one segment of the protocol at a time and more easily establish and keep to a set timeline.
Reduce handoff delays with electronic submission and routing
Many modern research offices still rely on emails for handoffs to reviewers and back to PIs. This practice can unintentionally delay reviews and submissions, as emails can easily become lost in a recipient’s inbox. Storing files in inboxes also adds to confusion around version control and increases the chances of referencing an outdated proposal draft.
Electronic submissions and routing via software specifically designed for protocol management resolves this issue by providing a single location for submission, review, and approval tasks and notifications. Platforms like Cayuse also centralize document storage and history to ensure proper version control.
Track approvals, renewals, amendments, and protocol deviations
PIs and administrators should carefully track all approvals, renewals, required amendments, and deviations to create a clear, traceable history for all protocols. However, as is the case with relying on emails for proposal routing, using personal devices or disconnected repositories to store this information can lead to errors, lost data, and poor version control. Lost protocol history can also become a costly liability in the event of an audit.
Protocol management software like Cayuse’s Risk and Compliance Suite automates this process by building and storing an active history for all protocols, providing easy access to requests, changes, and other attachments showing how a protocol has evolved over time.
How Cayuse supports protocol and compliance management
The Cayuse Risk and Compliance Suite streamlines and connects protocol management for IRB, IACUC, and IBC reviews, helping teams save significant time on protocol management while increasing accuracy and proposal success rates.
Streamlined protocol creation using configurable smart forms and procedural libraries allow institutions to configure their own protocol templates. These standardized protocol forms help PIs complete protocol drafts up to 35% faster without sacrificing accuracy, with an added benefit of helping new researchers better understand protocol requirements thanks to clear, guided requirement fields.
PIs using the Cayuse Risk and Compliance Suite can then automatically route protocol submissions to the appropriate review boards and committees, as determined by their entries. Integrated cross-committee views for overlapping IRB and IACUC protocols negate the need for separate submissions, helping to improve version control and saving time for both PIs and reviewers.
Reviewers are automatically notified of submissions requiring their attention and, once their review is complete, the PI is similarly automatically notified of any required action on their part. With all reviews and amendments stored on a connected platform and accessible, role-based dashboards, PIs and administrators can easily check a protocol’s status and history to eliminate bottlenecks, promote accountability, and ease reporting.
FAQs
Proper protocol management can lead to faster handoffs between PIs and compliance reviewers and ensures all reviewer concerns are addressed in revisions and amendments.
Integrations between protocol and grant management software help keep protocol histories and compliance information accurate and accessible. Cross-committee submission and approval features reduce the number of submissions and amount of redundant data entry required, saving time for PIs, administrators, and reviewers.
Protocol deviation refers to any instance of a research project failing to adhere to the terms established in the final protocol. Any deviations should be tracked centrally with all other protocol information and linked together when possible.
Managing research protocols using integrated electronic research administration (eRA) software ensures clear, accessible protocol histories to reference as needed for audits and compliance reporting.
Cayuse IACUC automates the full animal use protocol lifecycle, reducing review and approval time by 35-45% and improving transparency for all stakeholders. Cayuse IACUC’s centralized workflows eliminate redundant communication and paper tracking, while automated routing and digital sign-off save 10+ hours per protocol. Online protocol creation with configurable smart forms and procedural libraries also cut protocol preparation time by 30%.
Cayuse IACUC integrates seamlessly with Cayuse IBC for cross-committee validation of approvals and with Vivarium Operations to track animal usage and ensure animal requisitions and breeding activities are aligned with IACUC approvals.
Cayuse IRB streamlines the human subjects research approval process, helping institutions reduce IRB turnaround times by 30-50%, improve compliance accuracy, and provide transparent visibility for researchers and reviewers. Institutions can shorten approval cycles and accelerate research starts with built-in routing, alerts, and reporting. Automated IRB submissions, reviews, and approvals help cut manual processing by 40%.
Cayuse IRB integrates with Sponsored Projects, COI, and IBC, ensuring human subjects protocol congruency between funded projects, disclosures, and biosafety protocols, reducing audit prep time by up to 50%.
Cayuse IBC automates biosafety protocol management, enabling faster reviews, consistent documentation, and improved regulatory compliance. Institutions using Cayuse IBC report 30–40% faster approvals and significant reductions in incomplete or inaccurate submissions compared to manual processes. Guided smart forms tailored to different research types reduce protocol preparation time by 35%.
When connected to Cayuse IRB and IACUC, Cayuse IBC provides record linking between biosafety and human subjects or animal use protocols, eliminating redundant data entry and strengthening compliance integrity.